Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Some people believe that students in the universities should take the subjects whatever they like, whereas some others assert that they should be given a chance to study the subjects which are useful in the future. In my opinion, I agree with the former opinion, and this topic will elaborate with the following compelling reasons.
On the one hand, it is the responsibility of universities to turn a student into a decent professional. Although they lay the groundwork to excel in a student's vision, they should also consider their student's likes and dislikes. For example, every individual may have their interests and zeal to achieve something in their future. To accomplish in their future, they should always follow their dreams on the correct path right from the beginning of their career. By giving such freedom to a child at an early age, they will be able to develop their choice of interest in their domains and enhance their intellectual skills independently.
On the other hand, students play a vital role in this contemporary era. They are the future citizens. They should be obligated to their parent's and teachers' views. They serve a great purpose in the country's growth. It is noticeable that Science and technology are the most booming assets in the current world. Anything can invent with the use of these two fields. To illustrate this, an undergraduate who opts for such themes in their curriculum will be able to gain more knowledge of the increasing technologies worldwide. Without Science and Technologies, we may not have experienced the taste of such inventions by great scientists like Einstein, the invention of the bulb, Graham Bell, the discovery of the telephone, Madam Curie, and the findings of radioactive materials. Nothing is impossible if we use these dual fields. A student who uses these electives in their academics can enhance their skills in the future at the workplace. Consequently, it helps to lead a well-developed society in the present world.
To recapitulate it, as it stands now, even though universities that include electives like Science and Technology play an inevitable role in molding a student's career for their future, they have to provide an option to opt for their choice of interests was my opinion.
- The charts below shows the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in the year 2000 and 2010 73
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden Portugal between 1967 and 2007 68
- Every year several languages die out Some people think this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages To what extent do u agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foregin country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your ow 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ed to their parents and teachers views. They serve a great purpose in the countrys g...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, so, well, whereas, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07238605898 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85298027308 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530831099196 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7490027108 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5789473684 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6315789474 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310159456393 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989903873793 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112708318359 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210506681833 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111846032031 0.056905535591 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.