Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
For some people, giving a right for the students to choose what to study is a worthy practice to maximize their knowledge and experience. In contrast, shaving track for the students can be more effective because it helps them to focus on the most practical lessons. In my view, there is no absolute answer to which way is better because each one has different benefit and the students need to balance between both styles for several reasons.
To begin with, typical children have more enthusiastic to learn about their favorite areas than the subjects that they have no interest in. The more willing to learn, the better results of studying, because the students will pay more attention to the class that is interesting. For instance, one of my friend in university, who never appeared in the physics class, was always the first person who submitted the computer class assignments. Thus, the youths should determine their preference to learn because it will bring out the highest capacity that they could perform.
However, adult, who has more experience about the career and life, should act as a coach to manage young people to receive the most fruitful knowledge and get ready for the real world. As an adolescent, the student may cannot figure out the professional life as much as the grown-up person can. It is the teacher’s responsibility to guide the student what to learn, even though there are some tough subjects that are quite hard for an average person to understand.
In conclusion, there are advantages in both ways of learning: allowing the students to choose their own lessons brings out the better study results and giving the suitable guide can help the students in the professional life. The university students should attain both aspects so that they will get the most out of their valuable time in the university.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-06-19 | haphuonggg | 56 | view |
2020-06-19 | haphuonggg | 56 | view |
- Reading materialIn many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider rang 83
- The charts below show the percentage water used fordifferent purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information byselecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whererelevant. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 70
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in my view', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.206395348837 0.247107183377 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.142441860465 0.155533422707 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0872093023256 0.0946595960268 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0494186046512 0.0501214627716 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0406976744186 0.0437548338989 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110465116279 0.122226691241 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0145348837209 0.0403226058552 36% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.59235448367 2.80594681477 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0494186046512 0.0326793684256 151% => OK
Particles: 0.00872093023256 0.00163938923432 532% => OK
Determiners: 0.125 0.0861772015684 145% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0348837209302 0.021408717616 163% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0232558139535 0.011925033212 195% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1847.0 1933.35771543 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 316.048096192 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95806451613 6.12580529183 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.354838709677 0.374742101984 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251612903226 0.28420135186 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18064516129 0.203846283523 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0935483870968 0.137316102897 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59235448367 2.80594681477 92% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.037074148 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538709677419 0.56093040696 96% => OK
Word variations: 56.0191570436 60.7387585426 92% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0891783567 75% => OK
Sentence length: 25.8333333333 20.7743622355 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.946526461 49.517814964 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.916666667 127.492653851 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.7743622355 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.814263465372 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 50.9946236559 49.1944974215 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.425 1.69124875643 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32555607121 0.332605444948 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.143899734554 0.102741220458 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0590642153802 0.0668466124924 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.666219625243 0.534860350844 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0921879078342 0.148594505496 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159409983096 0.134430193775 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517097432422 0.0742795772207 70% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.399795189269 0.324371583561 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0249997095675 0.0638462369009 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231771286476 0.228012699653 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235486979033 0.058150111329 40% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.