In the past few years, technology has taken unimaginable strides and has significant impact on human life. Media and transportation is believed to have shortened the distance, giving people the opportunity to make friends with those who would never have a chance to meet in the past. While some people argue that the online communication has several drawbacks, it is much more beneficial for the human race.
On one hand, there are many merits of international communication. Firstly, due to the access to internet in almost all parts of the world, people can communicate with any person at any hour of the day. In the past, people could only keep in touch with people they know through mail or phone which was expensive as well. However, with the development of social websites such as Facebook, Skype and MSN, people can make new friends as well as keep in touch with their loved ones who are miles away. On Facebook, people can become members of the group having same fields of interest, thereby helping the people to acquire and share information.
Secondly, online communication has helped flourish trade and business eliminating the need to travel. For instance, a customer can order supplies online through just an email, without having the need to meet the vendor face to face. Thus, in this modern world where one has to work more in less time, online communication has made everything quick and reliable.
Finally, people can not only communicate through online messages and chats but even face to face. There are so many apps which have made face to face communication possible, few of the most popular apps being Watsapp and Skype.
On the contrary, international communication has few demerits. While this trend has made interaction easier with people all over the world, it has negative impact on social and personal interactions. People spend considerable amount of time chatting with friends online rather than meeting with them personally. Furthermore, this can lead one to the feeling of isolation. For example, in times of need people will have no one to turn in person, eventually feeling lonely and depressed.
In conclusion, although international communication has certain deficits, it has much more benefits. People should find a balance between social and online life.
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement. Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and example for to support your answer. 76
- Students at universities often have a choice of places to live. They may choose to live in university dormitories, or they may choose to live in apartments in the community. Where would you prefer to live? Give reasons for your preference. 73
- What discovery in the last 100 years has been most beneficial for people in your country? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 76
- Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People are never satisfied with what they have; they always want something more or something different. Use specific reasons to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... as keep in touch with their loved ones who are miles away. On Facebook, people can bec...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12466843501 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77018337833 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543766578249 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1292544438 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.85 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323839070956 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993138822569 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542036293738 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172885103875 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423090312973 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.