Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor bike To what extent do you agree or disagree

There is a belief among some people that requiring drivers to take an annual driving test is the ideal way to improve road safety. However, I must respectfully disagree with this opinion. I believe that conducting driving exams every year is an impractical and costly solution that will not significantly improve road safety.

To start with, it is unquestionable that the driving test process is complex because it takes too much time. When people arrive at the driving test venue, they must wait in line for ID verification and biometrics, as well as for their turn to show their driving skills to government officials for approval of passing the test. As a result, people may waste their whole day taking a driving test. Furthermore, it would also be difficult for the government to administer driving tests every year. The government might struggle to handle a large number of applicants if everyone took their driving test every year, and this could lead to failure to provide adequate resources for such an endeavor.

Furthermore, instead of mandating annual driving exams, lawmakers should focus on upgrading road infrastructure, as the majority of accidents are caused by poor road conditions. It is better to improve road conditions than to require drivers to take a driving test every year.In addition, administering driving tests annually would be a waste of taxpayers' money. Instead of spending resources on conducting driving tests, the government should allocate funds for useful developments, such as schools, hospitals, transportation, and other public services.According to a study conducted by Columbia University, there was a 45% reduction in the number of accidents in regions where road infrastructure was improved. This clearly shows that improving road infrastructure is a more effective solution for enhancing road safety, compared to mandating annual driving exams.

To sum up , I disagree with this notion as taking driving test annually are strain for the government as it time consuming and costly.It is suggested that improving road condition is the best way to improve road safety.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...The government might struggle to handle a large number of applicants if everyone took their drivi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ivers to take a driving test every year.In addition, administering driving tests a...
^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: According
...ansportation, and other public services.According to a study conducted by Columbia Univer...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ating annual driving exams. To sum up , I disagree with this notion as taking d...
^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ernment as it time consuming and costly.It is suggested that improving road condit...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, as for, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, to start with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33134328358 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02804821027 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531343283582 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.4857716448 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.384615385 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7692307692 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211491058314 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931096520451 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535996638853 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16126753524 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383694109889 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.