Some people believe that increasing the minimum driving age is the most effective way to raise safety on the roads. I disagree with this idea because I think the best method is the one that can bring efficiency for a long time.
On the one hand, raising the driving age can ensure road traffic safety. First, according to real-life results, most traffic accidents happened because of a lack of care in driving. And most of these accidents were caused by young people. Because they are not mature enough to know how serious their actions lead to. Older people who have more life experience understand what they do and make wiser decisions in some dangerous situations. Second, increasing the minimum legal driving age can allow adolescents to have more time in practicing and improving their driving skills. They can attend defensive driving courses to have some tips on what to do in dangerous situations. After that, they can drive more carefully and the number of accidents will decrease.
On the other hand, I don’t support this method much. Because it has some effects in the short term and raises the driving age for a long time. There are still some old people driving unsafely after they’re drunk. How can we be sure that old people won’t commit driving offenses? Young people without driving licenses can still drive on the road. Who knows if they’re not old enough? For the longer term, I think the best way is to impose stricter punishments for driving. For example, people who cause serious offenses can be given a longer prison. Or a heavier fine for ones who commit misdemeanors. These punishments will make residents feel better when driving on the roads.
In short, the method that I suggest may have some disadvantages. But it’s better than the way of increasing the minimum driving age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... accidents were caused by young people. Because they are not mature enough to know how ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: THEYRE_THEIR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their'?
Suggestion: their
... some old people driving unsafely after they’re drunk. How can we be sure that old peop...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, still, for example, i think, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8996763754 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4382444884 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5382565203 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.8181818182 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0454545455 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321912297469 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977703813773 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934261485432 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235979361941 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604647816277 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.