Some people think that cars should be banned in big city centers. Do you agree or disagree?
It is widely believed that the government should discourage cars from driving in metropolitan areas. In my opinion, I completely agree with this notion.
The first reason why car-free cities exist lies in the health benefit. Specifically, rural areas are choking from pollution, and the significant source of pollution coming from car exhaust. In fact, WHO found that nine in ten people globally breathe in dirty air, contributing to seven million premature deaths every year. By implementing a car ban, people are more inclined to approach a more liveable lifestyle.
Secondly, the government might take the car-free plunge owing to the safety of cyclists and pedestrians. Particularly, in rush hour, there is no such apparent divide between the distance of each zone, leading to the overuse of pedestrian and cycling zone. There is no doubt that people traveling by bike or walking experience higher risks of getting involved in accidents. Therefore, the restriction of cars helps protect people from external harm and even induce a habit of using zero-emission modes of transportation.
Finally, people derive economic perks related to the prohibition of cars. For instance, the USA has boasted 10 billion parking spots for about 250 million cars, with many states devoting a more than 60% of their estate to vehicles. By reducing the number of cars on the streets, the government may save a great amount of money and allocate them for more serious problems such as climate change.
In conclusion, a pledge to ban cars can bring substantial benefits such as curbing emissions, bring safety for pedestrians and cyclists, and sparing money for countries. If the government enacted laws about car ban sooner, then hopefully we could tackle many problems before it becomes unfixable.
- The given pie charts compare the expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens 40
- The chart below gives information about the most popular types of holiday accommodation for the British in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 78
- The diagram below shows the process of milk production 92
- Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems Others believe that the celebrities can make the problems seem less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27622377622 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8216956525 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664335664336 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8803669705 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165342280709 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538410603063 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338246672629 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887725645815 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342281842262 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.