Some people think that children should learn to Pant and draw at school. Other believe it is just a waste of time. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
It is true that the creativity of drawing and painting can be become interesting skill of human. Many people argue that school should provide classic for children to teach draw and Pant. However other say that these are totally useless activities and should not be part of Curriculum. Both views will be discussed in this essay before arriving at a conclusion.
There are several merits to teach the drawing or panting at school. First and foremost, children can make bright skills with the help of painting or drawing which can prove to be good for their better future. For example, a person has best experience in art then he can use his skill as a profession which will foster his talent as well as also help to earn money. The next, the presence of practice at school for painting and drawing is act as a rule to hold pencil and making shapes on paper in their Motor skills to improve their skills. That's why it has become necessary for the children. Thirdly, another advantage of including these lessons are that it gives a chance to the children to discover their inherent talent for painting or drawing then can join a school to hone their skills.
On the second hand, the main argument against making these lessons a part of Curriculum is that they waste the time of children who have no attitude for drawing and painting because some parents pointed that these classes rarely teach anything behind the basic things that's why it is not considered best part of Curriculum.
Conclusion, learning draw and Pant is good activity for children at school because they can pursue this activity with interesting way. However every garden has some pros and cons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-24 | Kamaljeetkaur2254@gmaill.com | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...r Motor skills to improve their skills. Thats why it has become necessary for the chi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 764, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for painting or drawing then can join a school to hone their skills. On the ...
^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... teach anything behind the basic things thats why it is not considered best part of C...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'considered the best'.
Suggestion: considered the best
...nd the basic things thats why it is not considered best part of Curriculum. Conclusion, lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to draw'
Suggestion: to draw
...of Curriculum. Conclusion, learning draw and Pant is good activity for children ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...sue this activity with interesting way. However every garden has some pros and cons.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, then, third, thirdly, well, for example, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7785467128 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35000834927 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525951557093 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0242725311 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.230769231 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238617705946 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960634641059 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671239833173 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154125892919 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572201429489 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.