Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education,
and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial
background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is unquestionable that every citizen has equal opportunities to follow higher education.
I believe that the government should allow students to attend university free of charge.
However, I disagree with the policy of providing free higher education for all students
regardless of their financial background.
Supplying free tertiary education for students is a sensible national investment. Numerous
students, if not obliged to pay tuition fees can afford to cover their living costs;
thereby concentrating on academic performance or cultivate their professional skills.
Therefore, they may be well qualified for future employment. Additionally, university
graduates who have received governmental grants for all university tuition fees can
become productive citizens contributing to social betterment. More specifically, after
graduation from university, some graduates may become loyal and strong-willed
soldiers who could ensure national security and sovereignty or teachers serving to
raising people’s intellectual levels and shaping young generations’ behavioral patterns.
However, I oppose the idea of providing tuition fees subsidies for all students irrespective
of whether they are rich or poor. Several learners who live in poverty are entitled to free
tertiary education although they have no desire to enrich academic knowledge or
professional skills. In this case, this policy proves to be a waste of money. Another
explanation is that no sooner do national leaders pay all tuition fees for university
education than there is high likelihood of a deficiency in state budget for community
health services or public transport services which also require a huge amount of fund
investment from the government for the benefits of the whole society.
In conclusion, in my view, there are several benefits of free education at university level.
However, I disapprove that all students have free higher education opportunities no
matter how rich or poor they are.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Ibrahem23 | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Gurpreet_5577 | 67 | view |
- Development in technology has brought various environmental problems.some believe that need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems.other however believe technology is the way to solve these problems. 61
- The chart below illustrates the result of a survey on the types of houses people liked, taken in 2005. 78
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers,and mobile phones in communication has negative effects on young people's reading and writing skills. 61
- The graph below shows the average montly salary and the prices of white television. 11
- The table below shows the production of carbon dioxide in five different countries in 2006 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure employment. Additionally, university graduates who have received governmental...
^^^
Line 19, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ders pay all tuition fees for university education than there is high likelihood ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92150170648 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19010587617 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590443686007 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.1056700075 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.928571429 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.38176352705 548% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261033457723 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926464443629 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558920325051 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678829072244 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061335026696 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.