Some people think that government funding for schools should be spent on science and maths subjects rather than other subjects. Do you agree or disagree?
Globally, the issue of whether educational institutions should invest more in science and maths than in other learning areas has been a topic of discussion for many years. Some people believe that should increase investments related to science and math, while this essay strongly disagrees with it for two reasons. Firstly, it is unfair for those who enjoy studying other subjects. Secondly, it will also threaten science and maths learning.
To begin with, allocating more resources to science and math subjects can lead to an imbalance in the development of other subjects. Although it is popular for the younger generation to select future careers like engineers and doctors, which require a strong base of STEM knowledge, some people prefer to do other kinds of work relating to literacy. For instance, the number of young people who choose to study literacy in high school is as same as those who want to learn science in China. If schools need to cut down the money spent on those subjects, it will negatively impact half of the population. This is not the only reason.
Furthermore, reduced government investment in other subjects can prevent children from developing a well-rounded understanding of other related areas of knowledge. To be more specific, learning subjects like English, Arts, Health and PE are essential since students need well-rounded skills and different knowledge to be successful. A pupil, for example, cannot develop fully when he grows up without knowing how to communicate with others and keep himself healthy mentally and physically. Thus, information and knowledge that students can learn from classes outside of the STEM classroom are significant for their whole life.
In conclusion, this essay has argued that education systems should not spend on science and maths courses than others for two reasons, namely, it is not fair for students who will not choose those learning in the future, and it is bad for the acquisition of other vital skills. In short, greater government investment in science and math subjects will lead to an imbalance in talent development and uneven development of other subjects. All over the world, students will be much happier and more successful when they have high-quality learning for all the subjects.
- Some parents do not agree with the way teachers are teaching their children. Do you think that parents should express their disapproval to the teachers? 76
- Some people think that young people should spend more of their free time at home with their families and spend less time entertaining outside Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- TPO 42 81
- 4 The bar chart below shows the average monthly maximum temperatures for three Australian cities in the year 2016 67
- 11 The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22343324251 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73942394857 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542234332425 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5450910157 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.8125 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335738761077 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105646378994 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587757808092 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21304064195 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425134318092 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22343324251 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73942394857 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542234332425 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5450910157 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.8125 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335738761077 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105646378994 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587757808092 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21304064195 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425134318092 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.