Every year many opulent nations across the globe spend billions of dollars on searching extra-terrestrial life. Many people chime with the idea that the governments should invest extravagantly to learn life on the planet. This provokes ire of conservatives who deem that it is completely wastage of money and this budget can be allocated to solve the dire problems on earth. In this stance, I do not believe that there is one-size fits all answers.
It goes without saying that there are enormous pressing issues like food crisis, climate change, poverty etc. around the world which need substantial attention. Each day hundreds of children die from hunger and malnutrition. A recent study shows that an African child dies of hunger in every thirty seconds. Similarly, climate change leads us to a fatal condition day by day. Climate change results in global warming, drought, sea level increase, and so on. In addition to this, we have to combat against AIDS which is largely considered as a disease of poverty. Therefore, affluent countries ought to make budget to eradicate these grave issues.
Having said that, however, many a people oppose the former argument. They claim that searching extra-terrestrial life could bring boon to mankind. Searching for life on the other planets could be the way of answering mysterious issues about ourselves. Where did human being come from? Why is human being here? Moreover, if we find any life in the other parts of the universe, we then may learn from them many things and may be find the way out of our current pressing problems like, climate change, overpopulation, and so forth. There are also advantages that may be cannot predict ahead of time.
All in all, although we have to have priority in our grim problems on earth, research on searching for extra-terrestrial life should be carried out and got sufficient budget. This could bring us enormous benefits in future which may be beyond our imagination now.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980 1990 and 2000 73
- Since the 18th century technological advances have replaced people in the workplace With today s technology this process is happening at a greater rate Technology is increasingly responsible for unemployment To what extent do you agree or disagree wit 61
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher position What s your opinion 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, second, similarly, so, then, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05214723926 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75536116152 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61963190184 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.177799906 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4285714286 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5238095238 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139724680274 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337788153925 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046173881824 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832474540135 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560520804334 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, second, similarly, so, then, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05214723926 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75536116152 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61963190184 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.177799906 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4285714286 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5238095238 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139724680274 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337788153925 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046173881824 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832474540135 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560520804334 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.