Since the 18th century technological advances have replaced people in the workplace With today s technology this process is happening at a greater rate Technology is increasingly responsible for unemployment To what extent do you agree or disagree wit

In the current scenario, technical advancement had brought huge changes in the working atmosphere. In my opinion, even though it leads to a massive fall of human resources, it is also beneficial for a particular group of employees and the companies as overall.

Modern technology has replaced the man power with machine power. In the past, ground level works or manufacturing works were done by humans, but now, for production and packing processes, companies are depending on robotic or machine powers. For instance, in a report by CNN news, there is a huge hike in the unemployment rate in the developed countries because of the modernization of the workplace.

Another reason for the unemployment is, having a technological modification has reduced the cost of production by less labour hours. In addition, within a little amount of time, there is a huge outflow of outputs. In other words, machines can complete a particular job within the half of time that an individual could take.

Finally, top hierarchy level employees and companies are beneficial of the developed technologies. Changes in the technical backgrounds bring comfortable working and it could help to produce accurate reports. For example, there are so many Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software’s are available in the market to plan and execute their daily tasks. Furthermore, emails and online banking system help business to do the operation with the help of a laptop and an internet connection.

In conclusion, even though IT revolution had brought a dramatic increase in unemployment of lower hierarchy level employees, it has brought fortunes to the economy as overall.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...uction and packing processes, companies are depending on robotic or machine powers. For insta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30681818182 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06803918486 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6739675213 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.769230769 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131568004318 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430961900193 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531495003138 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643165170047 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364051479719 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.