Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 word
The question of financing the art industry by countries' authorities has recently become highly debatable in the global community. It is argued that the budget ought to be invested in industries that are more valuable for society than the arts. I absolutely disagree with the statement and consider that the funding of art performers is a vital part of society's happiness.
To begin with, the development of the arts can elevate the satisfaction level of the local community. This is because the industry affects the spiritual development of individuals, which, for its part, is one of the most important components of cheerfulness. It means that the vital step of increasing the level of happiness is the enlargement of local culture. For example, according to the WHO article published in 2020, people who lived in countries with well-developed arts expressed the highest level of life’s contentment. In other words, the arts have a significant influence on society.
Further, spending budget money on the arts allows the government to improve the quality of individuals’ lives. This is because the arts industry is an efficient way of expanding the morality of a nation. It means that not only can investing in the arts enlarge the satisfaction level of individuals, but also provoke a stable decrease in criminal activities that irrevocably affects the safety of local communities. For example, according to the BBC research conducted in 2021, the local art exhibitions positively affect people’s awareness and, as a result, reduce the number of crimes. In other words, investing in the arts can help the government to resolve lawbreaking issues.
In conclusion, I believe that the subsidisation of the art industry can upgrade the quality of people’s lives. It is better for everyone that the government should direct allocate a part of funds to the development of the art industry.
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Others say that this way of punishment is not accessible in today s world Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 11
- Some think that current generation should take steps to protect the environment for the next generation Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that death penalty is the best method for those who committed violent crimes Other people think that this measure is not appropriate in today s world Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people say that smoking should be banned in all public places even though it would restrict some of other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...individuals’ lives. This is because the arts industry is an efficient way of expandi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24918032787 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07469669106 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508196721311 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4195307798 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.733333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135619042599 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497153934592 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031909552925 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920509452418 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028727652197 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...individuals’ lives. This is because the arts industry is an efficient way of expandi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24918032787 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07469669106 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508196721311 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4195307798 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.733333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135619042599 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497153934592 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031909552925 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920509452418 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028727652197 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.