Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Some people say that governments should not invest their budget in arts and instead, this money can be spent on other sectors. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this for two main reasons. First, arts are beneficial to the educational system as well as the cultural values of a country and second, they are an economic source to some extent.
In terms of cultural values, arts including paintings, sculptures, architectures, and music play an integral role in shaping national identity because most artworks convey good ideas about love, compassion, and empathy, which enables local people to have thorough insights into their country and how it has evolved. Apart from that, the arts also contribute to the educational system. For example, students, besides learning mathematics and science, spend their time participating in art courses and exhibitions, their creativity and imagination will be nurtured.
Furthermore, alongside the influence of arts on cultural values and the educational system of a country, they are also a decent source of economy. In some countries such as Korea and the US, their music industries could earn millions of dollars every year. If artists or musicians can create high-quality products, this number will be significantly increased. In another case, arts help attract a huge number of tourists from other parts of the world and accordingly boost the economy of a country. For example, Eiffel Tower, which was the tallest man-made structure for many years, has generated a remarkable profit and gained its popularity for France.
In conclusion, although some people ignore the significance of arts and claim that it is pointless for governments to invest in, I, however, believe that arts make a great contribution to not only the educational system as well as the cultural values of a country but also its economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | nitish22 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | nitish22 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | nitish22 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | Mr.Strange | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-31 | Mohamedosama | 73 | view |
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations rather than the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 61
- In some countries young people are living in richer and healthier condition but less happy What are the reasons What might be done to solve this issue 81
- some people say that music is a good way to bring people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28187919463 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86577967086 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.192098845 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204894380027 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782116200788 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822687947096 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139060436649 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100350659629 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.