Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extend do you agree

The expenditure on artists and art creations these days is often the subject of many public debates and controversies. Some people believe that instead of wasting money on arts, the government should be held accountable for its fund for other sectors in the society.
Personally, I partly agree with this view because of great benefits that the art brings to us.
On the one hand, the art plays an important role in the development of the country, acquiring a huge popularity among people in societies. One of the main advantages is that the art arouses national interest and it seems to be of paramount importance, leading to fostering and developing creativity. Apart from that, because many students are nowadays overwhelmed by the heavy workload in lots of subjects and other extracurricular activities at school, art gives them an opportunity to blow off some steam as well as recharge their batteries after a long period at school. Therefore, it is necessary for the national state to allocate proper budget for arts to preserve and develop them.
On the other hand, there are many drawbacks if the authority ignores to spend money on other aspects such as education, economy especially healthcare and so on. Large sections of societies especially underprivileged are deprived of basic health facilities like vaccines and preventive health checkups. Moreover, if the government had diverted some funds invested in arts to other areas, it would have a strong younger generation due to the fact that learners can learn in the most effective schooling environment with a variety of modern technological educational equipment as well as valuable lessons with professional teachers.
In conclusion, it is essential for the national organizations to allocate appropriate it funds for all sectors including arts as each sector has its own contribution toward the development of the country.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25742574257 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03594487764 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8773809378 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.818181818 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165485615717 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604023731166 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052584864827 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928682592155 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538279272501 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.