Preserving historic buildings is vital to understanding nation's heritage. In the process of restoring them, some people beieve that the government should not compensate on any changes done in their traditional appearance, and that the buildings should be restored as they were. This essay will advocate a practical approach to this scenario.
Restoration is said as the process of accurately depicting the form, features and character of property as it appeared at a particular period of time by reconstructing of missing features from the restoration period. All around the world, there are many active redevelopment projects undertaken by the government to preserve the sanctity of these ancient treasures. However, it is not reasonably possible to restore each and every detail of these buildings as it was.
Primarily, the construction of these century- old buildings begins to wear in time. In such cases, some parts of the buildings might not be in a recoverable condition. Here, the architects need to reconstruct that particular part to give a complete look to the puzzle of these primavel structures.
Therefore, it is unaccomodating for the government to demand accurate traditional appearance of the buildings. Sometimes,a few relevant contemporary touches needed to be added to make the older buildings appeasing enough.
In conclusion, we can safely say that the government should not be insistent on minute preservation of traditional appearance of old buildings. Minor modifications can definitely be made to adapt existing buildings to compatible new uses. This not only make good economic sense, but preserve the legacy also.
- It is common practice for some students to take a gap year between high school and university in order to do charitable work abroad in underdeveloped countries.What are the advantages and disadvantages for young people of doing volunteer work? 89
- Does modern technology make life more convenient or was life better when technology was simple? 84
- Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages higher level of violence int hat society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- As water is a valuable resource governments all over the world should control how much water their citizens use To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 74
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ric buildings is vital to understanding nations heritage. In the process of restoring t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...property as it appeared at a particular period of time by reconstructing of missing features f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this century' or 'these centuries'?
Suggestion: this century; these centuries
...it was. Primarily, the construction of these century- old buildings begins to wear in time. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
...l appearance of the buildings. Sometimes,a few relevant contemporary touches neede...
^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...economic sense, but preserve the legacy also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4842519685 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21348847096 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59842519685 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7609694667 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193173895052 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648898921578 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534337962148 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10458642201 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338737765369 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.