Some people think that governments must insist on preserving traditional appearance of old buildings undergoing renovation or redevelopment. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Innovation in the construction of premises has been the order of the day. Presently, all countries have tendency to renovate their old buildings. Ironically, some people assert that the preservation of traditional outlook of old buildings is worthwhile to conserve our ancient architectural values. Here, i would like to accord with the given statement.
Manifold points stand up to shore up my views. First and foremost, the buildings of former times portray the original cultural heritage of king's time. To demonstrate, Taj Mahal, the first wonder of the world, is most prominent monument due t...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-05 | oberk | 73 | view |
| 2018-03-15 | kimloan268 | 76 | view |
| 2016-12-16 | math | 56 | view |
| 2018-03-15 | kimloan268 | 56 | view |
- Nowadays congestion and traffic jams are a common and major problem in most cities. Some people believe it is a good idea to construct wider roads to resolve this issue. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What can be the solution, in your opini 72
- Animals are used by humans for profit in many ways. However, some people don’t agree with this use of animals. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 98
- Old people take a while to begin using new technology, such as mobile phones. Why do you think this is happening? Suggest ways to encourage them to use mobile phones and new technology for their benefit. 80
- Trade and travel would be a lot easier with a single global currency that we all use Do you agree or disagree with this statement Would a single currency cause any problems 79
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 97
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.591 21.0 //some subClauses wanted.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 343 350
No. of Characters: 1793 1500
No. of Different Words: 202 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.304 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.227 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.037 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 134 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.591 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.372 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.247 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.478 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.017 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e people assert that the preservation of traditional outlook of old buildings is ...
^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...our ancient architectural values. Here, i would like to accord with the given sta...
^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...tural skills of indian architectures of past time. Hence, renovation of such monuments ma...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...l outlook and cultural definitions. Further emphasising on my point of view, modern...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'apart from', 'as to', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary', 'what is more']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245524296675 0.247107183377 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.150895140665 0.155533422707 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.117647058824 0.0946595960268 124% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0460358056266 0.0501214627716 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0306905370844 0.0437548338989 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125319693095 0.122226691241 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0485933503836 0.0403226058552 121% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.13702894859 2.80594681477 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0358056265985 0.0326793684256 110% => OK
Particles: 0.0076726342711 0.00163938923432 468% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0818414322251 0.0861772015684 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0179028132992 0.021408717616 84% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00511508951407 0.011925033212 43% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2201.0 1933.35771543 114% => OK
No of words: 343.0 316.048096192 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.41690962099 6.12580529183 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20517956788 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.402332361516 0.374742101984 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.303206997085 0.28420135186 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.247813411079 0.203846283523 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.177842565598 0.137316102897 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13702894859 2.80594681477 112% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.037074148 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597667638484 0.56093040696 107% => OK
Word variations: 69.0867038066 60.7387585426 114% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0891783567 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.5909090909 20.7743622355 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6578395559 49.517814964 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.045454545 127.492653851 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5909090909 20.7743622355 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.772727272727 0.814263465372 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.99599198397 100% => OK
Readability: 45.9116087994 49.1944974215 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.84269662921 1.69124875643 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260528426913 0.332605444948 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0680547756147 0.102741220458 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0597197799092 0.0668466124924 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.494227148719 0.534860350844 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155564540413 0.148594505496 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994125131177 0.134430193775 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432261084585 0.0742795772207 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.388693855338 0.324371583561 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0681591134002 0.0638462369009 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182082147908 0.228012699653 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512347772482 0.058150111329 88% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.41683366733 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 78.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.