Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that some unsafe activities should be forbidden by governments. Although there are some benefits of that, I would agree that it is not essential to ban some serious activities.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why governments should prohibit people who try playing some risk sports. First, playing some unsafe activities is the most common reason cause sports accidents in young people. This may lead to the rising in the number of accidents in sports. Furthermore, dangerous sports requires players have both physically and mentally healthy to play. For example, my friend tried to climb the highest mountain in my country last week, an unexpected accident injure him and now he has to stay at the hospital.
On the other hand, I believe that people should be encouraged to play whatever sports they love even though it is a dangerous sport. Firstly, serious activities can sometimes be more exciting. If an activity is more challenging, we might feel a greater sense of satisfaction when we manage to do it successfully. Secondly, almost of dangerous sport is closely related to the environment, it the reason why a lot of people chose playing serious activities to call for environmental protection. This may lead to raising the consciousness of people about protection the natural resource around us.
In conclusion, although both banning risk sports and let people free to chose sports to play are advantageous in their own way, it seems to me that government should not forbid risk sports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | Dongvo | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Hussey | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | tuandoan2010 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Bahar87 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | vinitpatel | 67 | view |
- With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas should people be looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 81
- Whether or not someone achievies their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas, should people be looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places? Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas? 60
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 61
- An increasing number of advertisement on Tv aim at children. What are the effects of television advertising? Should television advertising be controlled? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to play'.
Suggestion: to play
...it the reason why a lot of people chose playing serious activities to call for environm...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05158730159 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83046128501 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6948309316 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9230769231 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270186006405 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927198503226 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760750444521 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170158708206 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417460278871 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.