Some people think that governments should give financial support to
creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists
should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own
opinion.
Some individuals argue that the authorities should pay for brilliant artists, namely painters and musicians while others say that these people should be supported by other alternatives. From my perspective, I totally agree with the latter opinion.
On the one hand, creative artists should be funded by the governments of countries that they work in. All masterpieces created by unprecedented people which are served for the public should be paid by political leaders. There is an array of public exhibitions and performances, for example, which the local public is unlikely to be charged, attracting innumerable number of residents. As the entrance fee is zero, the creators of mind-blowing work would struggle to have a favorable living standard if the governments shirk their responsibilities to pay for them, acting as a deterrent to dissuade artists from being motivated.
On the other hand, there are other numerous sources that artistic works can be remunerated with a considerable amount of money. Firstly, income based on the number of audiences and consumers is one of the main sources for creative artists. A good example of this is that singers will attain an amount of money hinged on the number of tickets sold for their liveshows, and the more renowed the singer is, the more money he achieves. Secondly, Youtube, one of the most ubiquitous social media nowadays, is a marvelous financial source that artists tend to deploy to make money. Everyone is eligible to post their products on this platform regardless of categories, and the administrators working at Youtube will reimburse the owners of videos drawing a substantial number of viewers. Thus, artists have another choices of which they can take advantage to get out of the rat race without depending on the governments.
In conclusion, although money received from the governments is a decent financial source, I believe artists could opt for other alternatives such as the money achieved from selling tickets or Youtube to increase their income.
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real need of the society where such products are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourismcould be developed in the future.Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 67
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a usefuleducational tool. Others, however, believe that videos games are having anadverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks ofvideo games outweigh the benefits? 84
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people.Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 78
- The chart below shows the number of films produced five countries in three years. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24923076923 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94419255866 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572307692308 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.009570978 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.230769231 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192518690172 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697365539301 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688755452825 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127655476104 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390335978344 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.