Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about the backing of creative artists. While some people disagree with the idea of government support for artists, I believe that money for art projects should come from both governments and other sources.
Supporters of government funding for artists hold the view that it is valuable for the cultural preservation. This is because artworks are always tightly bound to a nation’s history, belief, culture and ethos. Subsidizing these artists and encouraging them to create freely without considering money will therefore have important implications to a country’s cultural diversity. China, for example, is known for its colorful cultural heritage like the Peking Opera which is not as appealing as they were centuries ago. Without the government investment, these art forms together with the culture lying behind may suffer a risk of loss due to the lack of instant economic benefit.
Nevertheless, the argument against government backing for art is that governments have more important concerns. It is worth emphasizing that the artistic creation is time-consuming and a little costly. If the government keeps pumping money into this domain, then there is not enough money available for other essential services, such as education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, the basic needs of a country’s residents. However, the works of creative artists is a luxury.
In conclusion, if artists are supported exclusively by the government, then there is a possibility that the creations of artists will be influenced and even controlled by the preference of authority. However, government help is sometimes necessary. Without the generous support of House of Medici, the banker in Italy, how could there be the flourishing Renaissance therewith. Therefore, the backing for artists should not only count on the government but also on other sources like entrepreneurs.
- Some people say the best way for the government to solve traffic congestion is to provide public transportation 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... works of creative artists is a luxury. In conclusion, if artists are supported ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60824742268 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11392923933 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3361038213 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247576030844 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867650292877 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690270765824 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166610276623 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699006460556 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.