Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural background living together in the same country makes the country develop faster. Do you agree?
Number of individuals consider that multicultural countries grow more quickly in comparison with homogeneous society. I completely agree with the notion because diversity is important for the new ideas and development.
First, various ethnic groups making interactions enrich each other with new point of views, attitudes toward life, solutions and cultures. People become more open-minded and tolerant which in turn helps the society to thrive because people do not waste their resources for contradicting different view but using the best solutions from the all introduced cultures instead. As a result, the economy of multicultural country will rapidly grow, as influence of new ideas from diverse cultures will support the growth. For instance, new kind of business can be implemented, such as Mexican fast food restaurant in my home city, which was opened by immigrants from Mexico. Surprisingly, it is become very popular in spite the fact that it is not our traditional food.
Secondly, as rule highly educated and skilled immigrants arrive in a multinational country. Consequently, host country have well educated skilled workforce which is definitely is useful for the local economy. In addition, part of the migrating people would bring new technologies with them and capital flow as well. For example, one of my colleague is from India, he brought with him a technology how to do processing of a LIDAR data, and modelling based on it. Due to this, our company was able to double our income in this quarter.
In conclusion, I totally agree that ethnical diversity in a country makes the nation to evolve sooner in contrast with homogeneous society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | Manish gami | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31698113208 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92520746831 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7825068844 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.384615385 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9230769231 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193002141997 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591627829443 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547160368035 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116516683831 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401553336649 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.