Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion

Sports is a noticeable event that has been developing for decades. To serve the demand of audiences around the world, there are so many tournaments being taken place, particularly the ones with scope of international. It is believed that host countries could gain some benefits after these competitions, while others think the result will somehow be negative.
In terms of celebrating sports events, there must have advantages. Because of the wide range, citizens around the world would know more about the host nation. As the beginning ceremony will be commenced by showing up national performances, this is a good chance to introduce foreigners some cultures and uniqueness of the country. Besides, hosts’ atheletes would probably feel more released when they can compete at such familiar place in comparisons with their opponents. If the event finished successfully, the host could receive some more investments to raise up their budget for escalating the quality of physical infrastructure, and it must include profits either.
On the flip side, hosting a tournament is not an easy mission. Host countries can be witnessed to have a lot of pressure lasting from the opening to ending ceremony. A huge amount of expenses has been wasted for just a few days, along with an enormous effort of preparation for years, the host tend to be exhausted physically and economically. Furthermore, in case that they are not paid off deservely for what they have taken out, from the later sponsorship to competition achievement, the situation will be worsen.
In conclusion, there are 2 sides of circumstances that depend on the reality of the host nation. But countries are still lacking of finance should not take charge of this risky task.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, so, still, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17021276596 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92114220419 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631205673759 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9276061672 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198082517086 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642097936462 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494586386933 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110942812047 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455987056143 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.