In conventional history, women were the housewives who took responsibility for house chores while men went to work to earn money for their families. Nowadays, it has changed a little bit when there are unbelievable opinions stating that the roles have been reversed when more and more men stay at home taking care of their children. For me, this is not really a good decision compared to both men and women finding money together that we normally see in modern households today.
The first thing to discuss is that the husband has long been considered as a breadwinner in a family. This mindset makes society recognize the strength of men in terms of financial issues, so a man who cannot earn a coin may have to bear terribly fierce attitudes from people around him. He must have felt guilty and insecure towards his wife who is having to struggle with work every day, hence, that man would feel useless and depressed if the situation lasted for a long time.
Moreover, when husbands have too much free time at home, they tend to be bored and find some other habits to do. There are many cases they seek for bad habits like drinking, smoking or adultery, which are reasons for breaking up between many couples of marriage. Besides, the wives are highly appreciated to nurture children because of their softness and endless compassion to the child she borned. Of course, these characteristics can also be seen by a lot of husbands. But the way women express their love seems to be more gentle and suitable for their offsprings' growth.
In conclusion, I think the burden of finance should be shared between both sides and they definitely should plan to balance the time for work and family. As a result, these families can maintain a sustainable relationship as enthusiasm as well as equal responsibilities arise between husbands and wives.
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 84
- The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ir families. Nowadays, it has changed a little bit when there are unbelievable opinions st...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, really, so, thus, well, while, i think, in conclusion, of course, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81388012618 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61979357453 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640378548896 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4503759394 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.384615385 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324614524113 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929387284457 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653586313768 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165310338456 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694372882953 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.