Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
These days, there is a controversial question about whether the government should invest more on the human population or animal species. Some argue that it is more valuable to allocate more funding on projects that benefit humans rather than animals. Personally, I totally disagree with this notion and this essay will give some reasons for my opinion.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that it is important to invest financial resources in proving the quality of citizens’ life. In fact, in many places, especially in highland and rural areas, there are always many people living in poverty and children can not go to school. Therefore, supported money from local authorities may help them deal with their predicaments. For example, the Vietnamese government encourages children with poor conditions to go to school by imposing no tuition fee on them.
On the other hand, I’m more convinced that spending money on conserving wild animals is also necessary, besides the human population because the important role biodiversity plays in human life. First, government expenditure is used to construct wildlife sanctuaries which possibly help protect wild animals and provide them with safe shelter, especially endangered species. Consequently, this can maintain ecosystem balance closely related to humans. For instance, there are many wildlife sanctuaries like Cuc Phuong national park which are used to conserve animals in the red list in Vietnam. Second, the government also establishes many organizations preserving wild animals. Hence, they can monitor human activities which damage the natural habitat, especially poachers. The most compelling evidence is the World Wildlife Fund, an international organization helping protect endangered species all over the world.
To sum up, I’m in favour of the government should invest its state money in not only the human population, but also wild animals in order to retain the eco-balance attached with human life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | mynguyen001 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways or should be government pay more money on improving public transportation What is your opinion 73
- Some people believe that the responsibility for the protection of the environment is by a transnational organization rather than each individual country To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 67
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways or should be government pay more money on improving public transportation What is your opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in fact, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49013157895 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83284424076 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601973684211 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2932500611 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.266666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211901500392 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652401434067 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563507460318 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129374124109 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456730513247 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in fact, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49013157895 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83284424076 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601973684211 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2932500611 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.266666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211901500392 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652401434067 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563507460318 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129374124109 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456730513247 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.