Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the
protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human
population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many people believe that spending large resources conserve the wildlife creators is less important than invest in human communities. Personally, I disagree with opinion given and I think that we should allocate our time and money to both wild animals and our population to make our lives healthier.
The protection of wild animals, of course, is a priority. In the term of natural life, the wildlife extinction results in ecological crisis which affects the biodiversity of nature. The illegal poaching of elephant ivory and rhino horns, for examples, will decrease the number of creators in the near the future. Therefore, protecting wild animals mean that preserving their habitat. Example of this, rain forest and wetlands not only are crucial accommodation for animals but also affect climate change. If human's urbanization destroys these factors, they will insult the food production. Worse than that, it definitely changes the atmosphere our environment which impacts directly to global's healthy.
Therefore, human communities are also benefited by conservation wildlife. Firstly, it will promote tourism from all over the world to these areas. Tram Chim National Park in Dong Thap province, for examples, always attract not only lots of tourist in Vietnam but also the number of backpackers foreign to experience the glamorous local nature. Secondly, tourism will grow dramatically and could create more jobs for natives. Quality life of local people will, therefore, increase rapidly when they have new jobs and the opportunities to make friend with tourists.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the view expressed in the statement and I believe that our resources should spend on human population and even wildlife creators.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Vijitha00 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | taho.ielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | taho.ielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | myra124 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | Tri H. Ho | 78 | view |
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. Whatcan governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because oftechnology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peoplemake? Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 78
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h impacts directly to globals healthy. Therefore, human communities are also be...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48148148148 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77699742125 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2533090427 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106789411695 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311719685679 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423508273145 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660380689125 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437369244953 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.