Some people think that a huge a mount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Wildlife and humanity are two indispensable and interdependent components of the ecosystem. Few individuals believe investment in the wildlife conservation is unfruitful and funds should be diverted towards the human development instead. I partially side with this viewpoint and personally reckon that the duo deserve all attention and care.

To begin with, the diversity in this living world is attributed equally by the wild animals as well as human beings, so, equal funding as well as time should be devoted towards the progress of both. Secondly, the interdependence of both makes it impossible for one kingdom to exist in the absence of another. Thirdly, there are instances where several economies of the world thrive on the revenue that is being poured in by the tourism industry and in turn the tourism is supported by the mysterious and stupefying wild animal collection and maintainence in the forms of zoos and wildlife parks. To cite an example, The Yosemite Park in USA and Great Barrier Reef of Australia attracts millions of sight-seers.

On the other hand, few counteries have limited resources that do not support their human population . Here, such nations get trapped in a dilemma ; whether to pay off on animals or feed and tend to the hungry mouths of the sapiens. People are the primary builders of a nation . It is the masses that contribute to exploit natural resources and help build the economical structure . So, if the population is well tended to only then it becomes possible to care for wildlife.
Last but not least , the primary caretakers and constructors are human beings so they need proper infrastructure, food and basic requirements to get viable environment for working.

To encapsulate, investments should be done equally on both animals as well as human resource as both are of prime importance for a country to survive. The ecosystem balance can only be maintained if proper care is given to both.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...at do not support their human population . Here, such nations get trapped in a dil...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ple are the primary builders of a nation . It is the masses that contribute to exp...
^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...it natural resources and help build the economical structure . So, if the population is we...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... and help build the economical structure . So, if the population is well tended to...
^^
Line 6, column 19, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... care for wildlife. Last but not least , the primary caretakers and constructors...
^^
Line 8, column 68, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... should be done equally on both animals as well as human resource as both are of prime imp...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10031347962 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94541323969 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595611285266 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6308121864 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.466666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115611748391 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358527860944 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347175567077 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613571029718 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256478636257 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.