It is clear that the recent debate on the co-existence between the international development and traditional cultures does not seem to come an end anytime soon. Although the increasing business and cultural relationships among different nations have certain implications on the status quo as well as current lifestyles, I personally believe the impact on national identities appears insignificant compared to the greater benefits this trend can bring.
To begin with, there are a host of reasons why national cultures are considered to be lost because of the cooperation among multinational organizations. This is predicated on the consumption that this development could pose a serious threat to cultural and traditional value. Take, for example, the acceptance of same sex marriages and premarital cohabitation, which used to be strongly opposed in the past. Similarly, the appearance of a myriad of fast food chains, KFC, say, coupled with the hustles and bustles from daily life, directly changes people’s eating habit. This provides an alternative option as opposed to cooking on their own, negatively underestimating the importance of family meals was the way their older generations did.
However, I would argue this tendency is far more advantageous. Firstly, since international companies are increasingly expanding their businesses, there is greater need for the labor workforce. This contributes to job opportunities for local people, helping residents to earn money and improve the standard of living. Furthermore, in order to compete with enterprises from oversea, local firms need to be more creative and innovative, which not only helps such domestic companies develop more sustainably, but also positively impact on the local economy. Finally, increasing cultural contacts between countries leads individuals to have a deep understanding of other cultures, avoiding culture shocks or unwanted intense conflicts. In fact, an Italian person fought with a local one on Bui Vien street due to the misunderstanding of non-verbal language.
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 84
- Task 2 Some people believe increasing business and cultural contacts between countries are a positive development while others argue that it is a threat to identity of a nation Discuss both view and give your opinion 78
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is in this case Is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people hold that we should spend money and time on the protection of wild animals while others suggest that the money should be spent on populations living in the poorest areas of the world What is your opinion 84
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out What are the causes What solutions can you suggest 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
... can bring. To begin with, there are a host of reasons why national cultures are co...
^^^^
Line 3, column 855, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isunderstanding of non-verbal language.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, well, for example, in fact, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65372168285 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22594477037 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660194174757 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5250607383 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.384615385 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140357668244 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434172593879 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426869306141 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924776413292 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188904846359 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.