Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has negative effect on young people’s reading and writing skills. Do you agree or disagree?
In the context of modern society, permitting for youngsters to use the computer has gained the public’s popularity. While some hold an opinion that this tendency harms children’s literacy, I partly disagree with this statement via the reasons given.
On one hand, there are several reasons why using electronic devices frequently is likely to affect pupils’ literacy skills. One of them is a decrease in thinking ability and creating a dependency on the Internet because the availability of information or answers on the Internet satisfying any requirement immediately has allowed them to put fewer resources to solve their problems. Moreover, one of the key factors in essay or writing skills comes from the capability of analyzing and finding suitable methods for every issue. As an example of this is Chat GPT, a website with a reservoir of knowledge from AI, every aspect from the academy to daily life can be answered properly. As a result, they can be astonished at unexpected situations.
On the other hand, the younger can be beneficial from these devices by taking advantage of their convenience. First, these create a space for young people to access easily sources of knowledge, especially learners studying other languages. Whereas studying passively with assignments from tutors, they are in search of extra practice on the Internet to improve four essential skills including listening, speaking, writing, and reading. For instance, IELTS students are able to read and distill sentence structure which probably increases their band score through numerous available essays. Additionally, computers and smartphones provide youngsters with online news, acting as a supporter for their reading skills, because of the supply of jargon relating to scientific topics.
In conclusion, although smart devices trigger negative effects on reading and writing skills, these also help them find other ways to boost their literacy ability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-05 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | hoangtam11 | 89 | view |
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some cities have vehicle free days when private cars trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses taxis and metro on vehicle free days To what extent do you think the advantages of 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reasons'' or 'reason's'?
Suggestion: reasons'; reason's
...ly disagree with this statement via the reasons given. On one hand, there are sever...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, still, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49169435216 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81816102182 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644518272425 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7661925301 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.153846154 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172776561585 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527366515917 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041614565785 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970924069991 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269295011943 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.