Some people think that international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
It is true that humankind have been encountering the unprecedented global air pollution. While many individuals argue that curbing air pollution by introducing international car-free days is promissing, I believe that other more effective methods should be taken into considerations.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why many people agree that the former approach is conducive to reduce air pollution. It stands to reason that the number the number of private cars has been increasing significantly in the new era as the result of the advent of state-of-the-art technology in car industry as well as high standard of living. Consequently, the more cars comsumed, the more exhaust emissions emitted, resulting in air pollution. International car-free days, therefore, would reduce to some extent the amount of emissions stemming from this mean of transportation and obviously contribute to environmental protection in the long run.
On the other hand, I would advocate with those who contend that there are numerous approaches besides this above-mentioned one that would be more effectively. Firstly, it is fair to say that air pollution is attributable to not only the increasing car comsumption but also other resources such as emissions from industrial areas. State government, thereafter, should interfere in this field by enacting environmental laws which restrict the amount of emissions of factories. Moreover, residents could be raised awareness by encouraging them to be involved in eco-friendly activites like planting trees, using public transportation or car-pooling system, which curb a large number of vehicles in street including private cars. By doing so, not only could it tackle this problem, it but also save national budget.
In conclusion, it seems to me that applying other methods would be highly advantageous, although international car-free days could be promissing to some extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-27 | Ngọc Lam | 89 | view |
| 2017-10-28 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 90 | view |
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities.Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 74
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- Schools should not force children to learn a foreign language To what estent do you agree with this statement 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ue that humankind have been encountering the unprecedented global air pollution. ...
^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the number'.
Suggestion: the number
...air pollution. It stands to reason that the number the number of private cars has been increasing sig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 666, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ation or car-pooling system, which curb a large number of vehicles in street including private ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58703071672 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26995944048 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587030716724 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4322290031 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.416666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0833333333 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214861765532 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785063476637 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613012060682 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150263734967 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517496876419 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.