Some people think that the Internet and communication technology are having a negative effect on social relationships. Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some believe that the Internet and communication via technology has generated tremendous unease in social relationships.I disagree with this opinion as beside the detrimental effects it has, these cutting-edge tools still encompasses advantages aplenty.
On the one hand, to be au fait with digital connections minimize the opportunities of individuals to secure a trustful relationship. A justification of this statement is that it is harder to clarify the honesty and other people's thought via a chat from online softwares. For instance, we can easily spot out the changes in other people's demeanor, hence, make a clearer assumption about them. Another point to make is that individuals without a proper approach to digital tools often suffer constant abuse. An array of fradulents occur boil down to this reason. As an illustration, many people have lost their money after a call from stranger disguise as the teacher of their sons and daughters transferring fake information and find a way to get money from these parents.
On the other hand there is a plethora of merits stemming from digital connections. Internet users have a predisposition to join multiple of communities or having more conversations when being anonymously. For example many students or alumni tend to join scholarship hunting groups to find some helping hands. Additionally with the advent of communication technology such as smartphones, it is of tremendous value for communicating in long distances.In lieu of making a long route or writing a letter, you can make a video call with just a handful of clicks
In conclusion, I believe that using these modern communication will definitely improve our social relationships though there are concretely adverse effect of it.This also explain why the number of people using digital communications is ever-increasing
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | bao nguyen | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...emendous unease in social relationships.I disagree with this opinion as beside th...
^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...ting groups to find some helping hands. Additionally with the advent of communication techno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...lue for communicating in long distances.In lieu of making a long route or writing ...
^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...video call with just a handful of clicks In conclusion, I believe that using thes...
^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ere are concretely adverse effect of it.This also explain why the number of people u...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39236111111 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26558577344 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628472222222 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 118.416061564 49.4020404114 240% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 141.181818182 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203554607076 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623546714229 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412065167648 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119355716571 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209272739745 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.