Some people think that introducing new technology can improve people’s quality of life in developing countries. However, others believe that free education should be offered. Discuss both of views and give your opinion
Many people believe that the introduction of new technology can increase people’s standard of living in developing countries while others think that free education is better. This essay will discuss both points of view and present my own opinion.
There are several reasons for the belief that new technology is an ideal method to improve one’s living. First, new technology brings people a good chance to access to modern tools and furniture. That means people can leave the old tool behind and enjoy the convenience that the updated technology do. Furthermore, in developing countries where farming is one of the main jobs, people hope no more than a good weather year. As a result, new technology may reduce the farmers’ dependency on the weather and get the farm work to be more controllable. Thus, people can get out of being overloaded by hard working.
Nevertheless, I hold a belief for free education can make people’s lives better. To begin with, developing countries often accounts for a high percentage of poverty which means many people strive for the fee to go to school. Free education can motivate the poor to get a high education without worrying about money. Moreover, instead of investing money in education, people can use that capital to focus more on their family’s economic growth. In that way, people can upgrade their standard of living and be more affluent.
In conclusion, I believe new technology and free education contribute a great part in people’s living in developing nations. It must depend on a specific situation to consider which ways are more practical and better for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-25 | Nguyen Ha 221 | 41 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts of view and present my own opinion. There are several reasons for the belief...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of being overloaded by hard working. Nevertheless, I hold a belief for free e...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...andard of living and be more affluent. In conclusion, I believe new technology ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14179104478 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87983324497 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563432835821 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1179901941 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39276040724 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139232430165 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882938069761 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263785999594 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082148422061 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.