As, our societies become more centered on city life. People have to rejuvenate themselves, pursuing a comfortable level of physical exercise. Thus, a compare between team sports and individual sports to find out which is more beneficial. We could take a close look before reaching the decision.
On one hand, the benefits of group activities are considerable and could let us feel stronger physically and mentally. Taking team sports does not mean the ego and learning how to get feedback without fearing your relationships are jeopardy which has a significantly positive effect to teenagers. In fact frequently contact with team, receive feedback from teammates build up their maturities. Beside that, a team game performance, necessitating a high level of coordination and reaction time, not just tuning muscles that teach us to appreciate the teamwork, to be aware of our strengths and how to contribute these strengths to the shared goal.
On the other hand, as having fun is a key. Being in a wrong team could sap your energy rather than feel empowered and choosing a sport or looking for a team would be difficult. Instead, we refer independent activities such as: doing gym or just go for a running that require a higher level of self-reliant. Success or failure depend on yourself and every competition could push your personal best which can improve your self-confidence and independence in all areas of life.
In conclusion, While there are some different advantages between two kinds of sport. Both of them bring people to the high level of physical exercise which affect positively to restore our body and mind.
- Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Indivudual sports and team sports 89
- Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use What are your views 92
- The table below gives the information on consumer spending on different items in five five different countries in 2002. 61
- The land for parks is wasted and should be used for other purposes Do you agree or disagree 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As, our societies become more centered on ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11610486891 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91942220187 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651685393258 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1719202057 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101364175527 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353984786226 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375728766864 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719960393333 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460602568773 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.