Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that participating in solo sports brings far more benefits. Meanwhile, other people believe that people will gain more benefits when engaging in team sports such as football. I personally agree with the second group.
On the one hand, there are various reasons that people think choosing to play individual sports has more advantages. Firstly, people who take part in solo sports have a chance to develop independence. That is to say, they need to try by themselves and make their own decisions because no one can help them during a match. This advantage isn’t appeared in team sports due to the support of other members when they face difficulties. Secondly, players in solo sports completely know that their success depends primarily on their efforts and concentration. Therefore, these people always make every possible effort to achieve their goals.
On the other hand, I would agree that taking part in team sports brings far more benefits. First and foremost, these sports help people improve their communication skills. This can be explained by the fact that people who attend to play the sport in teams can easily work effectively in a team environment and even sacrifice themselves for the sake of their team whenever needed. Additionally, joining a sports team bring a benefit that members are taught about the valuable life lessons and how can people behave towards others.
In conclusion, although there are myriad benefits from playing individual sports; howbeit, I am convinced to assert that engaging in a team sport such as football brings far more advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15769230769 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65428926067 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565384615385 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5820244727 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32155243878 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119680541408 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804382936657 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199192649156 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435993419961 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.