Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give
your own opinion.
The variety of different arguments have been put forward about the issue of whether students should study solely on their own, or get involved in a group. In my point of view, each study method has its own merits, hence, choosing which one to employ depends on the students themselves.
On the on hand, there are several reasons to clarify the effectiveness of being involved in a group- studying. First of all, the learning process could be facilitated. Among a group included a certain number of members, each one would perform well in distinctive fields, so that they can support each orthers in order to figure out the difficulties they face with during the learning time. For example, a student who specialised in Japanese might meet some troubles in Maths that he or she cannot handle individually. However, if that student participate in a group studying with classmates, they can help to solve the problem within a second. Secondly, students can have further discussion over the topic raised in their textbook or by their class’s instructor. As a result, every aspects of the subject would be thoroughly delved into. Thanks to this, all students will have a deeper insight into the issue, which can stimulate their cognitive skill as well as their knowledge’s development.
On the other hand, studying alone also proves to be workable for many students. Some students prefer to be in solitude while they are studying. A quiet environment enable them to concentrate effectively in their work without any external distraction. Moreover, studying independently allows them to work at their own pace, which can reduce the amount of time people spend studying, so they can manage their daily’s schedule more efficient. This is nearly impossible if that student studies in a group where members have to stick to the group’s studying timetable.
In conclusion, studying in a group or studying alone can be equally advantageous to students. Students should adopt the studying method which they consider to be more effective and appropriate for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | mnaufaln | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-12 | kwchung | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think it is a positive or negative situation 61
- Today TV channels provide man s sport show more than women s sport show Why Should TV channel give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 61
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- the diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13649851632 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79346872106 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584569732938 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1033495285 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.823529412 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310044270776 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105589901739 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759710197127 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226735177767 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084307988459 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.