Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that self-study is more efficient than study group, and vice verse. This is because studying alone makes student to focus on their material, while learning together can accomplish tasks quickly.
To begin with, it is believed that students study alone have an efficiency to be strict on materials due to avoiding disturbances. That is to say, when learners study by their selves lonely, they may not more struggle to hinder obstacles originated by friends, so that they can understand much information. For instance, scholars choosing to learn alone to review a material after class session have a tendency to fully absorb the lecture knowledge because they possess a immense chance to not waste time by gathering with classmates, discussing topic which is not related to the lecture.
However, instead of self-studying, group-based learning gives an opportunity to brain-storm idea in order to solve the assignment problem. This is caused by that if students own various ideas, then these are discussed, it will be effective due to the fact that they find a creative and quick solving in regards to the tasks, sharing erudition each others. For example, high school students registered in study club can share their own ideas to finish homework, working together to accomplish a tough question such as math. Therefore, it assists them because of finishing the math assignments creatively, and additionally they may not be in difficulties to know the solution in a long time.
In conclusion, spending time on self-study is to tackle the difficulties revealed by mates, while study club is created to share various brain-storming in order to solve hard assignment. Where possible, students should implement both study styles to maximize their learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | mnaufaln | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-12 | kwchung | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show the data regarding the time people spend on smartphones and tablets divided by category 89
- The chart shows the sales of five different kinds of jam from 2009 to 2014 73
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 78
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 61
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 470, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... lecture knowledge because they possess a immense chance to not waste time by gat...
^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
... they find a creative and quick solving in regards to the tasks, sharing erudition each other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25441696113 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88992798385 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7819117158 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.181818182 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0909090909 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263747607114 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101137380887 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524876557663 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165795274218 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391323576857 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.