Some people think that it is more important to build new houses than to plant trees To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is an irrefragable fact that both trees and greenery play a vital role in our daily basis. In spite of the lack of housing in cities and town, a plethora of people believe that trees should be planted in urban places rather than building a new block. I completely agree with this opinion. The following paragraph will highlight my point of view with sales talk reasons.
To begin with, trees are of significant importance in urban areas due to the face that they buffer sound, generate oxygen and clean the air of carbon oxide. Subsequently, people living in residential area with the fresh air and greenery will have a better health. Morever, green space are necessary for cities' ecosystem and urban beauty since they attract numerous wildlife such as insects, butterflies, birds and so on. As it follows, planting trees have brought a host of advantage to not only people' life but also the beauty of cities. In contrary, people would be more uncomfortable when living in concrete districts without trees and greenery. Additionally, if the government construct more blocks in open places, plentiful repercussion will appear such as congestion and the development of jungle areas. As a result, the percentages of unemployment and crime rate will increase rapidly without controlling. Take Hong Kong for an example, a large amount of residents are moving to suburban areas as the city is overpopulated and overcrowded. So building more housings are as not necessary as planting more trees for more oxygen.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that green areas facilitate the improvement of health not only mentally but also physically and the inhabitant' lifestyle. Therefore, governments and relevant departments should give favour planting trees rather than building more houses.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in spite of, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19097222222 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85285477758 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590277777778 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7079241673 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244927551826 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784270780491 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908872485629 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163416724343 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234259846468 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in spite of, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19097222222 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85285477758 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590277777778 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7079241673 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244927551826 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784270780491 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908872485629 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163416724343 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234259846468 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.