Some people think it is more important to plant trees in open areas in towns and cities than to provide more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Essay topics:

Some people think it is more important to plant trees in open areas in towns and cities than to provide more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Whereas a group of individuals states that it is vital to plant trees in urban areas, the conventional claim priority on house-built purpose. Personally logical and analytical assessment, a sharp agreement is my standpoint of view, which is clarified by evidence and information in the essay below.

Firstly, it is clear that planting tree in downtown seems to be dramatically beneficial for citizens in terms of environment. In detail, by photosynthesis process, green plants absorb carbon dioxide, as known as the fundamental compound can be detected from the significant figure of cities all over the world, and emission oxygen which is the income element of respiratory process. Moreover, several specific trees can filter harm dust and pollutant such as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, etc form the air we breath so that planting trees would help enhance air quality of the city. Not to mention, the floras take responsibility as sunlight-reduced objects. Moreover, a forest could create the in-town ecosystem with a diversity of faunas and floras live in harmony together; in this relationship, trees provide food, protection and homes for many species. The place is not only a brand-new hotspots of the city but also reducing a level of stormwater runoff; by this way, trees can help/ reduce erosion, pollution in our waterways and the consequences of flooding.

Secondly, using open areas to construct houses, skyscrapers, complexes or offices would expand the cities' capacity, which leads to meeting the housing demand. In detail, with skyrocketing of population, rural residents often immigrate to towns to seek for jobs. Therefore, resolving housing requests might be a progressing concern for authorities. Additionally, government could construct the extraordinary architectures in the open areas. By this way, the buildings could attract a drastical figure of domestics as well as international tourists in order to contribute to city development.

In conclusion, landsoil is one of the most critical natural resources that mother Earth gives to us so that the city leaders have to create calculative plans to use land resources not only for short-term goals but also for long-term stability. In my opinion, planting trees in open areas could bring back enormous benefits more than we could imagine.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-02-21 mimeomahong85 55 view
Essays by user mimeomahong85 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 896, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'hotspot'?
Suggestion: hotspot
...cies. The place is not only a brand-new hotspots of the city but also reducing a level o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
..., complexes or offices would expand the cities capacity, which leads to meeting the ho...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts often immigrate to towns to seek for jobs. Therefore, resolving housing reque...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41712707182 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07800388778 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616022099448 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6127882975 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.733333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164805865834 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495296011205 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500487618501 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891372617786 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340879573962 0.056905535591 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.