Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extend do you agree?
Many people hold the view that governments should invest more money on traffic facilities such as roads or motorways than public transportations. From my perspective, I completely disagree with this view for several following reasons.
The first reason for my belief lies with the fact that the public transport system can solve the causes of traffic jams. This is because our world is facing overpopulation, which means more citizens use their private transports than before. The mentioned situation may lead to many citizens having some difficulties while commuting to workplaces on time. Therefore, public transports such as buses or subways become the most suitable solution for this issue. For example, according to many surveys, 80% of workers who reach their workplaces on time by using buses.
In addition to the reason above, public vehicles help workers to save time and money on commuting. A clear illustration for this can be depicted through the fact that the cost of fuel, gasoline for instance, increases dramatically due to the lack of fossil fuels. Moreover, people have to spend more time traveling to workplaces because of the extreme traffic jams. Therefore, workers have a tendency to travel by public vehicles, which can have them commute at a very short time with an appropriate fee. This means they can save their budget to some extent. For instance, according to an article I have read before, workers at suburban factories spend $50 for public transport while others spend $100 for their private vehicles. Furthermore, public vehicles take 15 minutes to reach the factories while others spend 45 minutes commuting by their cars.
In conclusion, my viewpoint does not lie with the fact that the government should spend more of its national budget on improving roads than public vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-18 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | thanhtu000 | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-10 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-14 | paulha1107 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld is facing overpopulation, which means more citizens use their private transpor...
^^
Line 2, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... For example, according to many surveys, 80% of workers who reach their workplace...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20136518771 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71899933835 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539249146758 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6532553956 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204629837022 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749321739473 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651625487928 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144972968906 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235292083096 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.