Some people think it is one of the best ways to solve environmental problems by increasing the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As air pollution has become severe, many people think that the government should impose taxes to increase the cost of fuels to reduce exhaust gasses generated by vehicles. In my opinion, I do not advocate this perspective due to the negative effects on the society and economy.
To begin with, several negative impacts on society could be reaped from the increase in the cost of fuels, if it has been imposed by authorities. To be more specific, the cost of goods will be more expensive due to the limitation in transportations caused by increasing taxes on fuels. Therefore, citizens are likely to spend more money on products, which can cause many of them to not be able to afford to live decently. As a result, due to the high costs of daily supplies, the living standards would be degraded. For instance, people have to pay more than a 10% increment in the price of vegetables, since these vegetables were transported from other states.
Besides, the domestic economy of a country could be deteriorated, because the decrease in the number of transportations resulted from the expensive price of fuels. This could cause the imbalances in the distribution of resources among the regions, where there is a surplus with certain goods while others are short of them. By having these differences, the economy could face price gaps between regions. To some extent, it can also lead to monopolies, which is not good for the development of the economy. For example, a product could be varying from different prices among other cities, therefore, some individuals can leverage this disadvantage to hoard goods for their illegal purposes.
In conclusion, increasing the prices of fuels not only deteriorates the living standard but also causes difficulties for the economy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04778156997 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86313340197 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559726962457 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5523123017 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.769230769 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148621588357 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555000592677 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437701789453 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996352620777 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208061869022 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.