Some people think that new houses should be built in the same style as older houses in the local area. Others disagree and say that local authorities should allow people to build houses in the style s of their own choice. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
There are differing views with regard to the question of which housing style is the best. While some argue that residents should imitate the presence patterns, others, including me, believe that people should be permitted to make their own decisions in construction.
Some people are of the opinion that traditional styles in residential areas need to be continued in building industry. They assert that harmony creation in the appearance of a city is one of the most basic pillars in architecture, resulting in principal urbanization. It means that all buildings in a specific area are required to be similar, not only in terms of used material such as brick, glass or concrete, but also their size. Proponents of this idea argue that if, for example, a new high- rise building was created between numbers of low-rise ones, the result would definitely be in contrast with aesthetic rules. In addition, in this case, neighbor houses perhaps lose their light and airy spaces due to the shadow created by new multi-stage building.
In spite of these arguments, I believe that citizens should have this right to pursue their passions in house building. In fact, according to the citizenship rights, all residents investing individually are free to have their own choice related to their properties. For instance, it may be that some inhabitants tend to build an energy-efficient house to help protect the environment. Therefore, they have to select ultra-modern designs such as using double-gazed windows or insulated walls just to name a few, which may not to be matched with older styles. So, it is reasonable that residents are given enough opportunities to build their desirable house.
In conclusion, although similar styles in building industry leads to an attractive appearance, in my view, respecting citizen's taste is much more important than the beauty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-01 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | jagrit sharma | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | jagrit sharma | 84 | view |
- Many jobs in the home nowadays can be done by machines Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 95
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship that people make?Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and societies? Suggest some measurements that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. 84
- Some people consider price as the most important thing to consider when buying a product (such as a cellphone) or a service (e.g medical treatment) do you agree or disagree? 84
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ursue their passions in house building. In fact, according to the citizenship righ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, in my view, in spite of, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19933554817 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90664070198 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621262458472 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4364698713 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.384615385 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8461538462 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292185281006 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967265647186 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624550423617 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169410379855 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709441959273 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.