Some people think that a newly built house follow the style of the old houses in local areas, while others think that people should have the freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In recent years, the decide how to build a house in rural areas have been gradually controversial. Although some people think that houses in the countryside should be built to follow the style of the past, I argue that people can construct traditional or modern houses if they wish.
Rural constructions should maintain the wide variety of styles which ancient humans built in the previous period. One of the main reasons which can be put forward to explain the view is that maintaining the ancient houses in the countryside is a wonderful method to preserve historical and cultural values. In fact, the kind of house could be constructed with many invaluable architectures which previous generations created. Thanks to, people can have a profound insight into the lifestyle of their ancients as well as the cultural values of various communities. Furthermore, the values of history and culture protected can make significant contributions to the development of tourism in rural areas, which in turn improving the income and living standards of local people.
There are strong arguments that houses should be constructed follow owner own style. Because a good house which harmonizes with the owner’s favourite can have a lot of positive impacts on their mental health. A case in point is that with a person always have to face with a huge amount of workload, living in a spacious house with a small garden can help them relax, wash the dust of every day as well as recharge battery. The second reason is that constructing houses follow ancient styles will need a great deal of financial resource, which can be beyond the ability of many people with limited incomes. Therefore, people should have the right in order to build a house which is a suit with their dream and financial ability.
In conclusion, while there are the above reasons which persuaded some people that houses in rural areas should be constructed following the styles in the past, I believe that people should have the house as they wish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-12 | nguyen thi thu hien | 73 | view |
- in the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 87
- Some people say that subjects like arts music drama and creative writing are more beneficial to children and therefore they need more of these subjects to be included in the timetable Do you agree or disagree 89
- the only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. to what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- Woman and men are commonly seen as having different strength and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender? 61
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
In recent years, the decide how to build a house in rural areas hav...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple should have the house as they wish.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00296735905 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69106584089 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501483679525 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.335697235 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.692307692 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9230769231 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34915849557 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145970573252 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101794881149 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262469422435 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883445591027 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.