Some people think that non-academic subjects should be removed from the syllabus due to the dire importance of existing academic subjects.Do you agree or disagree?
There have been many discussions on the present education curriculum and it is debated too whether extra curricular subjects should be the part of academic syllabus or not. In my opinion, It should be part of the syllabus because of the below mentioned reasons.
The primary reason to disagree the statement is that extra subjects helps in the physical and mental development of students. Subjects such as physical education not only helps in providing the knowledge about different sports and their importance but also engages the student in physical activities which help in growth of their body. Playing chess improves mental skills and cognitive development.
In addition, the other reason behind my believe is that foreign languages which are part of non academic subjects provides multi-language speaking skills. It also acts as a great way to learn multiple cultures across different countries and their way of speaking. Students can further pursue career opportunities in the field of tourism. For example, they can become language interpreter and travel guides.
In contrast, it cannot be denied that there might be some individuals who agree the given statement. The main reason could be their thinking. Some people only see doctors and engineers as a relevant profession. To achieve that one has to study the academic subjects in more detail. And if students will not focus on academic subjects like science and Mathematics then they will lose their focus on these subjects and will not be able to handle the pressure of studying academic subjects effectively.As a result of this, they will waste their time on non-academic subjects and are not likely to get white collar and stable jobs.
In conclusion, I would like to restate that I totally disagree and believe students should pursue both curricular and extracurricular activities to explore different fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | ankushgurumaa | 56 | view |
- Some people think that non academic subjects should be removed from the syllabus due to the dire importance of existing academic subjects Do you agree or disagree 78
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones However others think oppositely Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In many cities crime is increasing. Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce crime levels? 70
- Historical objects should be brought back their country of origin To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that non academic subjects should be removed from the syllabus due to the dire importance of existing academic subjects Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...bus or not. In my opinion, It should be part of the syllabus because of the below me...
^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...In addition, the other reason behind my believe is that foreign languages which are par...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 500, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
... studying academic subjects effectively.As a result of this, they will waste their...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79654350146 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8792608176 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309943307954 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865135367046 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718426364848 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1434863877 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939475645516 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.