Some people think that not only should professional sports and cultural enterprises be sponsored by the government but also that amateur adult and children groups should get funding. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your position.
The idea of developing the industries of sports and culture by investing in sponsorship funding has been the topic of much debate in the last few decades. While others believe that this should be extended to amateur adults and children who are interested in these fields. From my perspective, I agree with the mentioned idea, and below is an essay clarifying my viewpoints.
On the one hand, considering commercial purposes, professional sports, and cultural enterprises are advantageous for the government. In addition, these sectors also uphold their country status and pride among other nations. These economic benefits come from an influx of tourists who flock to the country to spectate the events. That is why an astronomical amount of the national budget poured into the construction of new facilities.
On the other hand, these occasions merely offer a temporary boost to the local tourism industry, due to the government budget limit. In time, there are numerous talented adolescents and teenagers, who are not given an opportunity to express their hidden aptitudes. The underlying causes of this are basically lack of financial support. The search for financing in this case ends eventually at the doors of the respective governments. Therefore, it is clear that the responsibility of transforming these amateur performers into professional performers primarily lies with the government.
To conclude, bringing out the best from the fields of sports and culture can be done easily by a government when funding is available to those who excel in these areas. However, I think identifying and transforming young amateurs by means of sponsorship from these sectors can fetch better results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-12 | truongtuenhi | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-19 | hrbhalala | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, while, i think, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38432835821 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00544124873 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608208955224 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.404718966 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.071428571 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144544483538 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443565141098 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456816806358 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864556602271 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424157423303 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.