Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities, privately owned vehicles should be banned in city centers, while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While it is argued that private transportation should be prohibited to cope with the traffic jam in urban areas, another opinion is that this seems to be an impractical solution. I personally believe that there are other ways which are more realistic to solve this problem.
Admittedly, there are some justifiable reasons to believe that banning the possession of personal vehicles is a great way to deal with the congestion problems in numerous cities. The proliferation of private vehicles on the roads such as cars and motorbikes is contributing to the congestion of traffic. This is due to the fact that day by day, it is easier to buy private vehicles due to the variety of models and prices. Consequently, there is a large volume of transportation flocks into the road, especially during the rush hour, causing the phenomena of traffic jams. As a result, if the authorities enforce promulgated laws to ban the owning of personal vehicles, this phenomena can be solved because of the fewer number of transportations on the road.
However, I am convinced that there are more compelling reasons to say that this solution is not entirely effective. The key reason is that although it can partly help people to avoid getting stuck in the traffic, daily activities might become extremely inconvenient. This means that people can suffer the hassle of traveling without private vehicles. A good example is that in emergency circustames, someone coming down with serious sickness needs to go to hospital immediately might not have any other options but the ambulance, which might not arrive in time. Supposing that the worst case scenario may happen, this patient could pass away due to the lack of timely treatment. Another reason is that there are other effective measures to cope with this problem, typically improving transportation systems and infrastructures. For example, the Chinese government supports widening the road and adding paths that can do wonders for the traffic system since citizens have more space to travel back and forth . Consequently, plenty of cities in China can curb traffic jams these days although it has one of the most dense populations in the world.
In conclusion, I think banning private cars, motorbikes can only partly reduce traffic congestion, while it can be difficult in some emergency events. Moreover, there are other solutions that are more practical than prohibiting private transportations such as improving the traffic infrastructure.
- People are surrounded by advertising which has an increasing effect on our lives Do you think the positive effects of this outweigh the negative effects 70
- Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities privately owned vehicles should be banned in city centers while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 73
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e other ways which are more realistic to solve this problem. Admittedly, there...
^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tifiable reasons to believe that banning the possession of personal vehicles is a...
^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eration of private vehicles on the roads such as cars and motorbikes is contribut...
^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cks into the road, especially during the rush hour, causing the phenomena of traf...
^^
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...to ban the owning of personal vehicles, this phenomena can be solved because of the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 841, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ystems and infrastructures. For example, the Chinese government supports widening...
^^
Line 5, column 909, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ports widening the road and adding paths that can do wonders for the traffic syst...
^^
Line 5, column 1009, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...have more space to travel back and forth . Consequently, plenty of cities in China...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96464155848 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5525 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2715575198 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.058823529 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5294117647 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263953400215 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805431763405 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621517169773 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175886461576 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533524203376 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.