some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities, personal vehicles should be banned in city centers, while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution. Discuss both views and give opinion.
people's views differ as to whether or not private transportations should be restricted as a method to
tackle traffic jam in metropolises. while there are a wide range of reasons can be given to justify the
former, I am in favor of the latter.
there a several persuasive reasons to believe that banning personal vehicles is a feasible measure to
deal with the problem. If the government have private vehicles banned, there will be a substantial
reduction in the vehicles' quantity. As a result, residents resort to use public transportations such as bus,
tramcars, etc. Finally, citizens' traveling habits are likely to be changed. In conclusion, restricting
personal vehicles means reducing the number of transportations, which leads to a disappearance of
traffic congestion in big cities.
Despite the arguments expressed above, I concur with the notion that banning private vehicles is an
impractical approach when it comes to coping with traffic jam. The most significant cause is that the
inconvenience is seen when the citizens have to use public transportations instead of private ones. Since
it costs people more time and effort to get to the destination by public transportations than using their
own motorcycles or cars. while the mentioned solution is impossible to adopt, there are a abundance of
other measures. Firstly, the road campaigns that are probably not to be implemented by the road users
resulting significant traffic issues. people's perception is the profound reason of the phenomenon, so it
is more possible to solve congestion by raising citizens' awareness. Secondly, it is only when the
authority offers upgrading infrastructures that the traffic jams can be solved. Because of the
deteriorating infrastructures might deter the road user which unsue the congestion.
To sum up, it is a worse course of action when banning private vehicles is brought into play since its
impracticality. Numerous policies which are more effort-deserving are available for people to adopt for
tackling traffic jams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-10 | Nguyen Thu Trang | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Peoples
peoples views differ as to whether or not priva...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
peoples views differ as to whether or not private transportations should be restr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...to tackle traffic jam in metropolises. while there are a wide range of reasons can b...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... former, I am in favor of the latter. there a several persuasive reasons to believe...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'reason'?
Suggestion: reason
...the latter. there a several persuasive reasons to believe that banning personal vehicl...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...will be a substantial reduction in the vehicles quantity. As a result, residents resort...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...d. In conclusion, restricting personal vehicles means reducing the number of transporta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 26, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...n using their own motorcycles or cars. while the mentioned solution is impossible to...
^^^^^
Line 14, column 89, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ution is impossible to adopt, there are a abundance of other measures. Firstly, ...
^
Line 16, column 39, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Peoples
... resulting significant traffic issues. peoples perception is the profound reason of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...possible to solve congestion by raising citizens awareness. Secondly, it is only when th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es that the traffic jams can be solved. Because of the deteriorating infrastructures m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.440625 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25017878114 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3359435309 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.411764706 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.38176352705 502% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224002608105 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067528186713 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514497809237 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595437221543 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533874115495 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.