It has been a controversial topic, who should teach children social etiquette. They are the future of tomorrow, only studies won't mold them to be a good human being. Societal values also should be thaught them properly. Some people argue that, this should be thought in schools rather at home by parents. Others have an opposite opinion about this.
On one hand, people believe that schools should have the responsibility to teach children about how to be a good human being to others in addition to academic lessons. Children spent most their time at schools rather than home once they start their studies. So the teachers have more influence on them especially in todays context. For instance, if we look in to the curriculum pattern of developed countries we can find many subjects in relation to this filed. Moreover, teachers can teach social lessons at schools by showing good examples by implementing such practices in class rooms.
On the flip side of the coin, some believe that parents are the right persons to teach these kind of lessons to the children. Children always have more sentimental approach to their parents than anyone else. Therefore they will listen anything that their parents say to them. Furthermore, in every child's mind their parents are their heroes. They will automatically try to copy what their parents are doing at home. Hence, parents can teach children about social values by showing themselves as an example.
In my opinion, both parents and teachers have the same responsibility to mold a child as a good social animal. We can not put the entire responsibly on either of them, both of them have different kind influence in children. So a combined approach would be more beneficial.
- the bar chart shows scores of 3 teams a, b nd c over four different seasons. summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons were relevant. 66
- The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty so rich countries should give other types of help instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Airline Companies in many countries have reduced the cost of tickets. Discuss whether this is positive or negative developments. Give some examples based on your own experience. 84
- The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in Australia divided into three categories from 2001 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- It is important to construct common areas such as parks, playgrounds and squares in all towns and cities. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... parents are the right persons to teach these kind of lessons to the children. Children al...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...oach to their parents than anyone else. Therefore they will listen anything that their pa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ined approach would be more beneficial.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98615916955 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58764310528 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536332179931 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.950411594 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8421052632 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2105263158 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22479292221 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731257847833 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556643881244 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145568338115 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356811298919 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.