Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about the most suitable place to teach children how to be a good members of society. They raise a wonder whether children should learn social behaviors at homes or at schools. Some argue that teachers take more responsibility to educate children about social rules at home than their parents, and vice versa. Personally, I believe that youngsters need to learn social principles both at homes and at schools.
On the one hand, it is undeniable the fact that parents play a vital role in instructing children how to become good people for several reasons. Parents have a long-term interaction with their children, so they have tendency to follow adults behaviors especially among their family members. Additionally, children are likely to be frequently imparted advice from their parents in order to regulate their own manner. Therefore, if parents have good parenting styles, they will have positive influence on their kids.
On the other hand, teachers also have significant impact on their pupils. First, no sooner do children come to school than they are accustomed to the educational system. It is regarded as a systematical teaching method in favor of raising children awareness about both theoretical knowledge and social rules. For instance, there are a wide range of extra-curriculum activities in place of showing students how to behave well in the community. Second, many children can be affected by tremendous peer pressure in schooling system. Hence, the young people who cooperate with a group of well-manned friends tend to establish proper attitude.
To sum up, for the reasons mentioned above, both parents and teachers are equally in the responsibility of providing appropriate behaviour models for children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Julian Eta | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | koreets01 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Cho Oo | 61 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the US since 1980 with projections until 2030.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children them to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 89
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'member'?
Suggestion: member
...lace to teach children how to be a good members of society. They raise a wonder whether...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32014388489 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86520896099 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607913669065 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6643242131 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.6 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261669487406 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872324282354 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745717044751 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141012604624 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519333456344 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.