The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular Ul school in 1981, 1991, and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts above give information about the annual changes of total school spending in different categories which are insurance, teachers’ and other workers’ salaries, school furniture and learning equipment, learning resources. The pie charts compare the data of a specific UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Coming first, being the major spending part, teachers’ salaries accounted for the vast majority 40% of the total school spending in 1981. This section showed an increase to 50% in 1991, then it slightly decreased in the percentage of 45% in the year of 2001. To be in the same token, the figures for teaching resources made up 15% in total in 1981. Although it was up to 20% in 1991, it also fell to only 5% in 2001.
Following that, furniture and equipment part fluctuated constantly according to the 3 periods of time. This section occupied 15% of the total school expenditure in 1981, but then it sharply declined to 5% in 1991. However, in 2001, it rised to 23% in total amount of money.
The figures for insurance took up for a smallest parts in the year of 1981 and 1991, 2% and 3% respectively. Dramatically, it rised to 8% in 2001. Besides, the figures for the other workers’ salaries gradually reduced by 13% in those mentioned years.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular Ul school in 1981, 1991, and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the US since 1980 with projections until 2030.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children them to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 89
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 39, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... The figures for insurance took up for a smallest parts in the year of 1981 and ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89497716895 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8605547545 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547945205479 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.9936679076 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229458702467 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831407178761 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701496460765 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13861175583 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872508884195 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.