In this concurrent world, It is undoubtedly true that few people believe that planning future is wastage of time as some people concur that people should focus on the present. However, I quibble from them propound that it is good to think about future in present for better life.
Adequate evidences, are obtainable to substantiate the concept of good life in future. The top-notch concrete reason is they will get good job, money and house to live. Another rationale which hauls me to patron is that you can get girl for marriage. To uphold my notion I would quote instance of for migrating to other countries for higher education you have to plan for future to achieve a successful life.
What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. The public in general tend to distinguish that planning is waste of time and work on present. Which has multifarious reasons. To commence with some people deem that by that you can save time and also you can focus better in present life. Withal they also uphold the decision of your present life can be got changed also consequently that you ought to be gotten prepared of that. To illustrate without thinking anything of future you can see that people don't get what they tend to have in life or the goals they want to achieve.
To cap it all, you can see that better future planning is very much-needed for getting perfect life ahead. And also it gives them what they want to achieve in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...o substantiate the concept of good life in future. The top-notch concrete reason is they ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g is waste of time and work on present. Which has multifarious reasons. To commence w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...thing of future you can see that people dont get what they tend to have in life or t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61776061776 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33937965858 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525096525097 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6961032375 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4285714286 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3261940399 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109768055317 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117241928028 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214597587403 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141776983262 0.056905535591 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.