Some people think that robots are very important to humans future development while others think they are dangerous and have a negative effect on society discuss both the views and give your opinion
It is believed by some that, the development in robotics is very essential for human life in the upcoming years, while a chunk group of people argue that, it would be created a negative influence on the communities as well as dangerous. So prior, commenting, both the prespectives are discussed further.
There are several reasons why people argue that the robots are beneficial for human. Firstly, it will help to increase the production of manufacturing houses. What I mean to say by this is that, the robots can work 24 hours continuously, without taking any break, therefore production of material would be grown. For example, in India, Tata Motors converted its whole plant to automation, after that, the proportion of manufacturing was increased by 23%. Furthermore, robot can work in any extreme condition. By this I mean, it would be difficult for human to work in certain situations, such as fire and Tsunami rescue operations, at that time robots can be work effectively, it is proven by Japanese researchers.
On the other hand, a part of society believe that uses of robots would create hurdles for people. To begin with, it might be created unemployment problem. In other words, if the majority of work done by the computers, then the requirement of human labor will fall, it is observed in a gulf countries like, the USA, 30% of youngster unemployed due to Artificial intelligence. Secondly, it would lead to many health problem. In simple words, if robot action is involved in each and every task of human life, then people no need to work hard, as the physical activity of human body will be decreased, due to this many health barriers are arisen, like obesity.
In conclusion, I reiterate that the computer robots have their own advantages such as, work in hazardous condition and help to increase production, however it is also has a drawback, like increase the proportion of unemployment. If asked, I strongly support that in the future robots are beneficial for the societies.
- Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in traveling to work is to replace park and garden close to the city centre with apartment buildings where computer can live to what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The given pie chart shows the survey on education library Summaries the the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- In many society the role of mother and father is referred what are the reasons behind it it and what will be the future role of the parents 61
- Why criminals commit crimes whey they set free from the prison What are the causes of this case What are the solutions 78
- Why nowadays children spend majority of time on the TV rather than active activities What are the reasons behind this What are the solution to overcome it 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun health seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much health', 'a good deal of health'.
Suggestion: much health; a good deal of health
...ntelligence. Secondly, it would lead to many health problem. In simple words, if robot acti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, i mean, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97023809524 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89630281762 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.272684498 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6666666667 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158358265443 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533380897112 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483085532254 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106569509508 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556680023624 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.