It is universally acknowledged that 'Education is journey from the dark to light', but in the modern era just attaining education is not sufficient, student should also get merit in order to be noticed by the society. It is believed by some that students showing best academic results should be rewarded more than the students who show improvement. In my notion both should be equally reward without sidelining the efforts of either of the students as both deserve to be encouraged for their hard work.
To begin with, students who constantly perform good in academics deserve to be awarded for their consistency because if they lack motivation it may result in a gradual decrease in their performance. Felicitating a rank student at the end of term creates a competitive environment in the university or any educational institution, furthermore , rewarding students section wise also creates an easy competitive ambiance for the piers of the rank student as being pr-eminent in a classroom is comparatively easy. In few schools pupils get rewarded for performing well in particular subjects , this practice can show a good improvement in students as there are more opportunities for the pupils to be rewarded and encouraged.
In contrast, Every student is unique just like the measure of our fingers, then how can students with different potentials be graded on the same scale? ,In a classroom there are students with multifarious talents and potentials but they are being judged on a solo scale. Students with god gifted IQ level do not need to work hard when compared to a pupil with relatively less IQ, So most students don't get what they deserve when they put in reasonable efforts to excel in academics.
To conclude, It is mandatory to reward consistently good performing students to keep them motivated but in my opine rewarding students scoping for improving their grades is also equally important in order to maintain ideal learning environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'showing the best'.
Suggestion: showing the best
...y. It is believed by some that students showing best academic results should be rewarded mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ieved by some that students showing best academic results should be rewarded more...
^^
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...any educational institution, furthermore , rewarding students section wise also cr...
^^
Line 2, column 587, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r performing well in particular subjects , this practice can show a good improveme...
^^
Line 2, column 675, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students as there are more opportunities for the pupils to be rewarded and encour...
^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...potentials be graded on the same scale? ,In a classroom there are students with m...
^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...th relatively less IQ, So most students dont get what they deserve when they put in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, well, in contrast, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.109375 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97603204187 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0455266121 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.5 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316159052448 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152747392168 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143720939692 0.0667982634062 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206150600585 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916872292472 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.